The Obvious Deceit of Our National Territory 1935, 1973, 1987 Constitution National Territory of the Republic of the Philippines
Republic of the Philippines is a Corporation - not a Sovereign nation -by Ex-President Corazon Cojuangco Aquino (for expiration of interim territorial jurisdiction/Res Judicata).
The fifth Republic of the Philippines is a CORPORATION disguised as a nation and it is operating in a territory that it has no jurisdiction. We will reveal the actions taken by the Republic of the Philippines Corporation and the real motive why it is pursuing the entitlement of the OCT 01-4 (Legal Title of the Philippines [01] and the Whole World [4]).
1973 Constitution National Territory of the Philippines "Historic (Treaty of Paris) or Legal Title (OCT-01-4)"
Let us then take you to the painstaking journey of the Republic of the Philippines Corporation in earning the entitlement for the Torrens Title of the whole Philippine Archipelago, the OCT 01-4.
1935 Constitution National Territory is based from the Treaty of Paris (click to enlarge)
The OCT 01-4 is the tangible proof of ownership of the whole Philippine Archipelago and it is the Article 1 of the 1935 Constitution, the territory ceded by Spain to the United States in the 1898 Treaty of Paris.
Treaty of Peace Between the United States and Spain; December 10, 1898 TERRITORIAL BOUNDARIES OF THE PHILIPPINES Article I, Section 1 of the 1935 Constitution: Spain cedes to the United States the archipelago known as the Philippine Islands, and comprehending the islands lying within the following line: line running from the west to east along or near the twentieth parallel of north latitude, and through the middle of the navigable channel of Bachi, from the one hundred and eighteenth (118th) to the one hundred and twenty-seventh (127th) degree meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, thence along the one hundred and twenty-seventh (127th) degree meridian of longitude east of Greenwich to the parallel of four degrees and forty five minutes (4° 45') north latitude to its intersection with the meridian of longitude one hundred and nineteen degrees and thirty five minutes (119° 35') east of Greenwich, thence along the meridian of longitude one hundred and nineteen degrees and thirty five minutes (119° 35') east of Greenwich to the parallel of latitude seven degrees and forty minutes (7° 40') north, thence along the parallel of latitude of seven degrees and forty five minutes (7° 45') north to its intersection with the one hundred and sixteenth (116th) degree meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, thence by a direct line to the intersection of the tenth (10th) degree parallel of north latitude with the one hundred and eighteenth (118th) degree meridian of longitude east of Greenwich, and thence along the one hundred and eighteenth (118th) degree meridian of longitude east of Greenwich to the point of beginning.
The fifth Republic of the Philippines has a void National Territory that is why it needs to gain the ownership of the OCT 01-4 so that it will have a tangible proof of its jurisdiction. The entitlement of this torrens title is not only the ownership of the Philippine Archipelago but also the ownership of the 617,500 metric tons of gold deposited in the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas, the 1.8 million metric tons of gold and all other precious stone and metals deposited worldwide which is owned by the Royal Filipino Family. Those are the same wealth being pursued by Karen Hudes, Wolfgang Struck, Neil Keenan, Alpha Omega World Marshall Development Program, H-World, Tala Estate, different Ferdinand Marcos groups, Republic of the Philippines and all other claimants worldwide. The Republic of the Philippines Corporation is one of the most knowledgeable group that knows the truth about the claim of ownership, that whoever will be entitled with the ownership of the OCT 01-4 will also be the owner of the wealth so it availed every option there is to entitle the ownership to its favor. Those who reached the top of the administration has maneuvered the hereditary succession of the whole archipelago in favor of the government, where in actuality, the people has no information about and has not been consulted for their consent because the real motive of those in the administration is to get the treasuries for themselves. They used the Executive, Legislative and Judiciary branches of the government to stir the ownership in their favor even though their claim is null and void to begin with.
Here’s a summary of the struggle of the Republic of the Philippines to their claim of OCT No. T-01-4 (ownership of the Philippine Archipelago and all the wealth of the Royal Filipino Family):
I. The Republic of the Philippines(under Macapagal) petitioned that ownership be recognized in favor of Prince Lacan Acuna Tallano against Rodriguez and be awarded in favor of the national government because the late Prince left no heir. The LRC/C.C. 997, decision was awarded in favor of the Republic of the Philippines, but the decision was reverted in favor of Don Esteban Benitez Tallano an alleged surviving successor in interest.
The intervenor filed a motion to return the 617,500 metric tons of gold and 500,000 pieces of 10 karat diamonds. The ownership of the treasuries is interlocked with the ownership of the OCT 01-4. There are also other treasuries deposited worldwide that is interlocked with the OCT 01-4, these treasuries are administered by the Global Debt Facility(IMF, WB, FRS). These treasuries are the main interest of the Republic of the Philippines that is why they are pursuing the ownership.
II. The Republic of the Philippines, through their agent Benito Tallano, filed a motion to intervene to stop or delay the awarding of ownership in favor of Don Esteban Benitez Tallano prior to the release of the decision on July 14, 1964 and decision be awarded in favor of Julian Morden Tallano, son of Benito Tallano. The LRC/CC 3957-P Decision with Compromise Agreement was awarded in favor of Julian Morden Tallano.
III. Outside court struggle of the Republic of the Philippines can be traced on the Indigenous Peoples Right Act (R.A. 8371) Section 64, where the National Commission on Indigenous People was mandated to take appropriate legal action for the cancellation of official documented titles which were acquired illegally. The action for cancellation shall be initiated within two years from the effectivity of the act, 1997 to 1999 only. The action for a period reconveyance shall be within a period of ten years. This section pertains to the quest of the National Government to find the original copy of the OCT 01-4 because they know that the reconstitution of the duplicate copy in the LRC/CC 3957-P is void from the very beginning.
The Republic of the Philippines is looking for the genuine OCT 01-4 and they used the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples to look for it and reconvey it to the government (as if it was legally owned by the government that it needs to be re-conveyed?).
IV. The Republic of the Philippines filed for annulment of the LRC/C.C. 3957-P Decision with Compromise Agreement and all other decisions, orders, writs, judgment, documents released in connection with the Decision with Compromise Agreement for the reason that the court lacks jurisdiction over the case. They were forced to annul all those because their motion for reconsideration was denied by orders released by the Pasay RTC Branch 111 dated July 7, 1997, July 11, 2001 and October 8, 2001. The Republic of the Philippines has chosen to annul all these so that they can avail a petition for retrial, appeal or relief from judgment.
The Republic of the Philippines still believes that the ownership will be awarded to them because they strongly believe that there is no heir, and the Pasay RTC has no jurisdiction of the case therefore all decisions, orders, writs, etc., that emanated from the reconstitution proceeding in LRC/CC 3957-P are void.
The court cannot rule that other documents connected with the case of ownership (specifically the representations of the owner in the Treaty of Divine Highlights in the Secret Book of Redemption of the Treaty of Paris). This is valid and the Court of Appeals is just clueless about this because the ownership is protected under Omerta (extreme secrecy and non-participation) and Divine Intervention.
V. In 2006, NCIP Provincial Director Datu Sergio T. Sumatra respectfully endorsed HRH Salvacion Legaspi Y Espiritu Santo to the Regional Office of the NCIP in Region X.
The Majesty, the Queen of the Grandfather Maharlikhan Tribe, has declared self-governance under Indigenous Peoples Right Act ( R.A. 8371) and Local Government Code (R.A. 7160) and the jurisdiction is within the OCT 01-4. The National Commission on Indigenous Peoples being the implementing agency of the R.A. 8371, offered no resistance and has certified that Queen Salvacion Legaspi y Espiritu Santo is the rightful claimant of the OCT 01-4. Her claim is correct and within the bounds of the framework of the Law of the Land. The Supreme Court received their copy and also offered no resistance with the claim of the Majesty and the declaration of self-governance that supersedes the Interim Republic of the Philippines. In recognition to the authority of the Majesty, the Supreme Court sends notices to Queen Salvacion regarding actions they have taken with the petition of other claimants.
Excerpt: As the law commissioned me to do, it is my duties, to affirm, and as prescribed, as a Provincial Officer of National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP), of the Philippines, THAT ALL RIGHTS AND CLAIMS IS CORRECT AND WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF THE FRAMEWORK OF THE LAW OF THE LAND AS PRESCRIBED. -Datu Sergio T. Sumatra
In consonance with Section 11 of Article XV of the New Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, and pursuant to Republic Act 8371, Presidential Decree 892, Presidential Decree 772, executive and administrative order, rules and regulations applicable to ICCs/IPs, and so Article XIII, Section 18.8 under Human Rights of the Philippine Constitution MANDATES TO GRANT IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION TO ANY PERSON WHOSE TESTIMONY OR WHOSE POSSESSION OF DOCUMENTS OF OTHER EVIDENCE IS NECESSARY OR CONVENIENT TO DETERMINE THE TRUTH IN ANY INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY IT OR UNDER ITS AUTHORITY, IS HEREBY REQUESTED THAT POWERS, DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNCTIONS VESTED UPON HER BE GIVEN RESPECT AND CONSIDERATION. Furthermore, it is requested that ALL SUPPORTS, AIDS AND FACILITIES BE EXTENDED TO THE ABOVE-NAMED PERSON WHILE IN THE EXERCISE OF HER POWERS, DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND FUNCTIONS BASED ON THEIR CUSTOMS AND TRADITIONS. –Datu Sergio T. Sumatra
With all the letters of the Sovereign Queen and certifications given by Provincial Director Datu Sergio T. Sumatra of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples, the Supreme Court has received, they have taken Judicial Notices. The Supreme Court then subsequently sent the Majesty, copies of the Notices regarding their actions in connection with the issue of ownership.
Section 1. Judicial Notice, when mandatory. - A court shall take judicial notice, without the introduction of evidence, of the existence and territorial extent of states, their political history, forms of government and symbols of nationality, the law of nations, the admiralty and maritime courts of the world and their seals, the political constitution and history of the Philippines, the official acts of the legislative, executive and judicial departments of the Philippines, the laws of nature, the measure of time and the geographical divisions. Section 2. Judicial Notice when, discretionary. - A court may take judicial notice of matters which are of public knowledge, or are capable of unquestionable demonstration, or ought to be known to judges because of their judicial functions.
Judicial notice, in its appropriate field, displaces evidence since as it stands for proof, it fulfills the object which evidence is designed to fulfill and makes evidence unnecessary. For instance, courts have always and without exception taken judicial cognizance without proof of those great historical events which have affected the destiny of our nations or of other nations. The grounds of their notice are the common knowledge and open frame of such events.
Section 1. Judicial Notice, when mandatory. - A court shall take judicial notice, without the introduction of evidence, of the existence and territorial extent of states, their political history, forms of government and symbols of nationality, the law of nations, the admiralty and maritime courts of the world and their seals, the political constitution and history of the Philippines, the official acts of the legislative, executive and judicial departments of the Philippines, the laws of nature, the measure of time and the geographical divisions. Section 2. Judicial Notice when, discretionary. - A court may take judicial notice of matters which are of public knowledge, or are capable of unquestionable demonstration, or ought to be known to judges because of their judicial functions.
Judicial notice, in its appropriate field, displaces evidence since as it stands for proof, it fulfills the object which evidence is designed to fulfill and makes evidence unnecessary. For instance, courts have always and without exception taken judicial cognizance without proof of those great historical events which have affected the destiny of our nations or of other nations. The grounds of their notice are the common knowledge and open frame of such events.
The Supreme Court Resolution Notices were released and send to the Majesty without HRH Queen Salvacion Legaspi y Espiritu Santo participating in the case. The letters sent by the Majesty and Certifications of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples are factors in the Resolution of the Supreme Court under Gr. No. 171913 (1972 Compromise Agreement).
VI. Since the action for cancellation already lapsed in 1999, Senate Bill No. 467 was filed by Senator Jinggoy Estrada to grant another ten years extension for the NCIP to pursue Section 64 of the R.A. 8371, now that they know who has the authentic OCT 01-4.
As we can see, this is in accordance with the plan of the government as stated in their petition under CA GR SP 70014.
Conclusion: With all the evil motives and actions of the government to steal the ownership of the OCT 01-4 from the real owner, they failed and truth prevailed. The apocryphal owner exists and has won the recognition of the Supreme Court. With due respect to the majesty of the Constitution, Article 18 Section 13 must be promulgated. The lapse of the Interim Republic of the Philippines is now effective, the government must then also promulgate their assumed obligation from the United States in the 1898 Treaty of Paris (Article 17, Section 1.4 of the 1935 Constitution). The Republic of the Philippines must concede for the “cession government” Kingdom Filipina Hacienda, now here to supplant the Interim Republic of the Philippines in accordance with the Treaty of Paris.
The Republic of the Philippines has been operating without Territorial Rights of Jurisdiction since
July 4, 1974 and it has no right whatsoever, to claim any parcel of land within the Philippine Archipelago because the ownership belongs to someone else, now revealed as the Queen of Motherland, HRH Queen Salvacion Legaspi y Espiritu Santo. This is the reason why the Republic of the Philippines has no right to assert its ownership over the Spratleys and Sabah. The only way to recover Spratleys and Sabah is by asserting the private rights of the owner - the Sovereign Queen, but the new nation Kingdom Filipina Hacienda must rise first and supplant the Interim Republic of the Philippines, and the Treaty of Paris and Treaty of Versailles be ratified.
The struggle of the Republic of the Philippines in acquiring Territorial Rights of Jurisdiction is nothing but a grand thievery to conspire the right of the real owner over the land, and to gain ownership of the infinite treasuries deposited worldwide which is interlocked with the ownership of the Original Certificate of Title No. T-01-4.
Loading...